Discussion:
hand coloring (again)
(too old to reply)
susan pickford
2006-10-06 18:24:10 UTC
Permalink
I have just come across a quote by Pierce Egan complaining about
industrially produced pirate copies of Life in London which might be of
interest: "heroes of steam-engine velocity have not only produced huge
quartos without being at the expense of a pennyworth of ink, but have also
had the knack of procuring high prices too ". (Quoted in Anthony Gully,
Thomas Rowlandson's Dr Syntax, 1972, p. 154). This might suggest a more
cottage industry approach to colouring on Egan's part.
Best wishes,
Susan Pickford
J***@LAC-BAC.GC.CA
2006-10-06 20:21:03 UTC
Permalink
It surprised me that the subject of hand-colouring prints doesn't seem to
have merited a specific study in either book publishing or art historical
literature, as far as I know, since hand-colouring continued to be done to
prints at least until the advent of widespread use of colour lithography in
the 1850s. The vast majority of etched and engraved prints seem to have been
sold uncoloured, and to have been hand-coloured after the fact. But this is
a difficult subject to deal with, although I think there is widespread
acknowledgement in the printing trade, and among print scholars, that most
hand-colouring is usually contemporary to the publication of the print.

I did look for some sources. For example, in Timothy Clayton's The English
Print, 1688-1802, published by Yale University Press for the Paul Mellon
Centre for Studies in British Art (New Haven, 1997), there are numerous
examples given of hand-coloured English prints from the 16th century forward
(illustrations 2, 11, and 19, for example, all date from the early 16th
century). Clayton discusses a variety of issues relating to hand-coloured
prints. He mentions the preference given in the early 18th century to prints
hand-coloured in France as opposed to hand-colouring done in England
("French coloured", pp. 31-32). He constantly refers to the greater cost of
a coloured versus an uncoloured print with examples from throughout the
century - a print of a Roman Mosaic discovered in 1712, for example, could
be purchased for 1s. plain, or 1 guinea printed on superfine paper and
"painted with the same variety of colours that the said Pavement is
beautified with" (p. 65); on p. 141 he mentions that a set of portraits of
racehorses published by Butler in 1753 were sold for 1s. each as uncoloured
sheets or 5s. coloured and framed, and noted that each was "colour'd the
proper Colour of each Horse"; while he mentions that a 1789 set of satirical
prints was double in price between plain and coloured impressions (p. 232).
Unfortunately Clayton only mentions in passing (p. 289, footnote 15) the
popularity among ladies of the fashion for colouring mezzotints in the late
18th century.

I am not sure this adds to or clarifies the question in the original
posting, but I would imagine that a customer paying more than twice as much
for a coloured as opposed to an uncoloured satirical print would have had
the opportunity to express a point of view about the nature of the colours.
This would hold true for much hand-colouring, unless, as was the case of
prints done after original paintings, or prints which related to nature
subjects, the authenticity of the colours was the point of the colouring.

Perhaps others know of a good source for this subject?


Jim Burant,
Art, Photography and Philatelic Archives
Library and Archives Canada

-----Original Message-----
From: SHARP-L Society for the History of Authorship, Reading & Publishing
[mailto:SHARP-***@LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU] On Behalf Of susan pickford
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 11:14 AM
To: SHARP-***@LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU
Subject: Re: hand coloring (again)

I have just come across a quote by Pierce Egan complaining about
industrially produced pirate copies of Life in London which might be of
interest: "heroes of steam-engine velocity have not only produced huge
quartos without being at the expense of a pennyworth of ink, but have also
had the knack of procuring high prices too ". (Quoted in Anthony Gully,
Thomas Rowlandson's Dr Syntax, 1972, p. 154). This might suggest a more
cottage industry approach to colouring on Egan's part.
Best wishes,
Susan Pickford
dfarren
2006-10-07 14:39:41 UTC
Permalink
The recent message citing as a source Timothy Clayton's _The English Print,
1688-1802_, published by Yale University Press for the Paul Mellon Centre
for Studies in British Art (New Haven, 1997), provides an excellent lead.
However, I wonder about the assertion in the message that "the vast majority
of etched and engraved prints seem to have been sold uncoloured, and to have
been hand-coloured after the fact." The statement reminds me of the old
belief that until the advent of publishers' bindings in the nineteenth
century, bindings were bespoke, that is, bound "after the fact" of
publication. However, recent research has established that many books were
sold pre-bound by the bookseller, as well as in sheets, the binding of which
the buyer could commission. Accordingly, I daresay that prints and maps were
sold both pre-colored by the bookseller and uncolored, the coloring of which
the buyer could commission or not, leaving the purchase uncolored.

Curiously, there are parallel discussions of this matter being
simultaneously conducted on SHARP-L, subject as above, and on ExLibris,
subject: "hand coloring".


Donald Farren
4009 Bradley Lane
Chevy Chase, MD 20815-5238
***@concentric.net
voice 301.951.9479
fax 301.951.3898
mobile 301.768.8972
Barnhill, Georgia B.
2006-10-07 21:05:45 UTC
Permalink
I found evidence about the hand coloring of natural history plates that
is in an essay I wrote years ago, "The Publication of Illustrated
Natural Histories in Philadelphia, 1800-1850" in The American
Illustrated Book in the Nineteenth Century (Winterhur Museum, 1987).
Wives and daughters were doing some of the coloring. Also, pieces of
sheet music with pictorial lithographed covers were sold uncolored and
colored (at a higher price of course). Some prints, such as aquatints,
were sold with hand coloring, because of the nature of the process. On
the other hand, there are many nineteenth-century engravings in today's
marketplace that were colored in recent decades. Finally, with respect
to Currier & Ives, AAS has a copy of invoice from James Baillie dated
Dec. 12, 1840, for coloring several hundred lithographs for Nathaniel
Currier. The assembly line coloring came later.




Georgia B. Barnhill
Andrew W. Mellon Curator of Graphic Arts
American Antiquarian Society
185 Salisbury Street
Worcester, MA 01609
(508) 471-2173
(508) 753-3311 (fax)
***@mwa.org; www.americanantiquarian.org

.
John Renjilian
2006-10-07 14:41:07 UTC
Permalink
Most of the published information I have seen concerns Currier & Ives. The
website of the American Historical Print Collectors Society (www.ahpcs.org),
quoting from the Philadelphia Print Shop website, states that cheaper C&I
prints were colored on an assembly line basis, often leading to sloppy work;
more expensive prints were done by one individual and tended to be more
carefully done. I suspect in earlier eras the coloring would have been done
more by individuals than groups; James Gillray's usual publisher, Hannah
Humphrey, had a small shop and limited assistants, for example. Any attempt
at mass production would have had to be done off premises, and was probably
not a common occurence. The image of her shop done by Gillray in 1808 shows
in her window a copy of a whimsical portrait of Humphrey and her shop
assistant playing whist with a picture dealer and another man, etched by
Gillray in 1796. Such longevity might argue against a need for mass
production. It would lend itself to coloring to order, but I have not seen
that documented.

John Renjilian
Post by J***@LAC-BAC.GC.CA
It surprised me that the subject of hand-colouring prints doesn't seem to
have merited a specific study in either book publishing or art historical
literature, as far as I know,
susan pickford
2006-10-07 14:40:20 UTC
Permalink
Jim Burant raises some interesting points but I would wonder to what extent
the conditions in which individual prints were hand-coloured are applicable
to series of prints, particularly in the early-to-mid 19th century when
techniques of mass-production were coming into use. Hubbard's The English
Illustrator (quoted in Gully, Thomas Rowlandson's Dr Syntax, p. 12),
decribes Ackermann's studios as being filled with "deft fingered girls,
dipping their brushes into saucers of harmonious, standardised hues, [who]
applied the principle of mass-production to book illustration". I would
imagine this is also how Egan's series of plates was coloured.
Best wishes,
Susan Pickford
susan.pickford
2006-10-07 21:05:24 UTC
Permalink
Ackermann's colouring workshops were actually on the premises of his shop in the Strand, the Repository of Arts, which opened in (I think) 1809; Rowlandson would pop in on a daily basis to see how the work was going. Ackermann was obviously a moderniser, as his was one of the first shops in London to install gas lighting, so other print sellers may have still been using individual artisans while he was developing the assembly line. However, I think it's quite likely that by the 1820s, the assembly line model had spread. Again, I think the key difference here is between individual prints and prints produced in series, and since Life in London is pretty closely modelled on Dr Syntax (at least in terms of the publishing model) I'd think it likely that the same method of production was used.
Best wishes,
Susan Pickford
J***@LAC-BAC.GC.CA
2006-10-10 19:53:13 UTC
Permalink
Two further references about the hand-colouring of plates:

1. Geoffrey Wakeham's Victorian Book Illustration (Detroit: Gale Research
Company, 1973) discusses hand-colouring in his section on etching (pp.
22-28). After mentioning Cruikshank and his work, he states:

"Another illustrator of The Ingoldsby Legends was John Leech (plate
7), best remembered perhaps for his etchings to Surtee's sporting novels,
such as Mr. Sponge's sporting tour, 1853, and Handley Cross, 1854,
hand-coloured in the tradition of sporting prints. Hand-colouring, of
course, increased the cost of the plates, and books containing them were
generally from half as much again to twice the cost of uncoloured copies.
W.M. Thackeray's Dr. Birch and His Young Friends, 1849, illustrated with the
author's own soft ground etchings, cost 5s. plain and 7s 6d coloured (plate
8)."

2. Simon Houfe's The Dictionary of British Book Illustrators and
Caricaturists 1800-1914 (Woodbridge, Suffolk: Antique Collectors Club, 1978)
discusses the Ackermann firm in great detail, particularly working methods
for hand-coloured book plates. In his discussion on aquatints (p. 18), Houfe
notes that

"Aquatint was favoured not only because it was a perfected process
but because it imitated the brushwork obtainable with watercolour.... The
plate might be printed in brown, olive, green or red, sometimes in two or
three colours, before being tinted by hand. It is known for example that in
Ackermann's last major work The History of the Royal Residences, 1829, the
interior views of the palaces were printed in one colour and the exterior
views in two, blue and brown, for the sky and buildings. The process from
original drawings by C. Wild, J. Stephanoff or W. Westall would have run
thus: when the watercolour was handed to the engraver an aquatint would be
made of it, and a proof returned to the artist for colouring; this would
then be used as a model by Ackermann's large staff of experienced colourists
(Colour Plate II).

The publisher's other great discoveries were Thomas Rowlandson,
1756-1827, already referred to and William Combe, 1741-1823, whose talents
he brought together... In this way Dr. Syntax in Search of the Picturesque,
1812, was born and became one of the classic illustrated books of its period
(Colour Plate III). The black-clad doctor on his awkward horse became the
hero of a whole generation and started a fashion for aquatint engravings
opposite rhyming texts..... Pursuing this further one would arrive at the
episodic literature of the late Regency, Pierce Egan's Real Life in London,
1827, with coloured plates by Heath, Dighton, Alken and Rowlandson....."

The use of the term "coloured plates" rather than "colour" plates indicates
that these were normally hand-coloured over colour aquatints. In a further
part of his essay, Houfe discusses caricaturists like Cruikshank, Heath,
Rowlandson, and Newton, noting (p. 33) that their printed caricatures, "the
forerunners of the illustrated papers... were sold at a penny plain and
tuppence coloured but not yet in book form."

None of this settles the argument about whether the hand-colouring varied
because of individual taste, the ability of the individual doing the
hand-colouring, or because the hand-colouring may have been done after the
fact, but it does add some information to the discussion, especially as to
whether book illustrations were sold both uncoloured and coloured, as well
as to the working methods employed in the Ackermann publishing house.

Looking forward to more input from others.....


Jim Burant, Library and Archives Canada
Ottawa, ON K1A 0N4
(819) 934-6841
(819) 934-6810
courriel/e-mail: ***@lac-bac.gc.ca
Dijstelberge, P.
2006-10-10 22:45:09 UTC
Permalink
some observations of a bibliographer with about fifteen experience:

- 16th century: colored woodcuts - the whole edition is done, most times in a rather clumsy way.

- 17th-18th century - expensive books are colored according to the wishes of the buyer. Prices must differ since there is a clear stratification: quality of the craftsman, the paint and the gold used

- late 18th century: whole editions - engravings - are colored and this may be announced on the title-page. Sometimes individual craftsmen (or women) do the whole print, sometimes they apply one color each. Sometimes great differences in quality may be noticed in one edition and I suppose this leads to a difference in pricing. Types of books: nature: birds, insects and the like and almanachs.

Also: colored printing starts at the end of the 17th century with colored engravings.
Philip Weimerskirch
2006-10-10 22:46:01 UTC
Permalink
There is a section on "Colouring & finishing of prints & photographs" in Printmaking & Picture Printing; A Bibliographical Guide to Artistic & Industrial Techniques in Britain 1750-1900 by Gavin Bridson and Geoffrey Wakeman, Oxford, The Plough Press; Williamsburg, The Bookpress Ltd, 1984. See pp. 41-43 (references A227-A241).

Phil Weimerskirch, Special Collections Librarian
Providence Public Library, Providence, RI

Loading...